Heathbar's Crunch - Latest Comments

Re: Bloons Tower Defense 3 – full browser window version (SWF)

matt — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:05:16 -0000

When I click the link, nothing happens?

Re: The Dollar Vote & The Minute Vote

Ruth — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:09:51 -0000

Loved this selection, also.

Re: Sweet hypocrisy

Paulo — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:02:29 -0000

Hey Chris, I sent a mail to Mclures company, but I don´t know if it´s you.
I am Paulo from Brazil, please, write me at gmail

Thanks!

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

pink — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:44:02 -0000

Hey, im an ex-oinker power user with great ratio. Lifes been pretty awful without oink… im sick of shitty torrents and no seeders… looking for a waffles invite, pleeassse??

elibogaaan@gmail.com

Re: Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Chris Heath — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:10:42 -0000

Yeah... this story is one of the one's that nobody wants to talk about because it's such a disgrace. It's not like you can blame any one nation. It's all our fault.

Re: Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Connecticut Man1 — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:34:46 -0000

No, I didn't know this. That is a sickening thought...

Re: CIA Chief Hayden Names 3 Subjected To Waterboarding In Senate Hearing

Tom Paine — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:34:41 -0000

Now that George Bush and Michael Hayden have publicly confessed to government waterboarding in a press conference on February 6, 2008, and in testimony before Congress on February 5, 2008, you may find the following information useful:

The law review article referenced below (available at no cost at: http://www.law.utah.edu/_we... ) makes clear that waterboarding is torture and is a crime and a war crime punishable under a number of treaties to which the United States is a party and several U.S. statutes.

The article also explains that there is no defense available due to either (1) prior legal advice, or (2) circumstances (including, without limitation, terrorist acts – see citations in Footnotes 21 and 25 in the article), contrary to the claims of Bush and Hayden.

The law review article (see pages 359 to 374) also establishes that under a number of treaties to which the United States is a party, the U.S. has an obligation to initiate an official investigation regarding confessed acts of torture. For example, the 1984 U.N. Convention Against Torture, (1465 UNTS 85), Article 12 reads as follows:

“Each State Party shall ensure that its competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation, wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed in any territory under its jurisdiction.” (NOTE: The article also explains why “territory under its jurisdiction” includes GITMO and all DOD and CIA secret detention sites for the United States.)

The following case, among others, has held that waterboarding is torture:

In re Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos Human Rights Litigation, 910 F. Supp. 1460, 1463 (District of Hawaii, 1995)

Waterboarding is torture regardless of the surrounding circumstances – there is no circumstantial or necessity defense to torture claims.

It is time for the appointment of a special prosecutor – General Mukasey must recuse himself because of his refusal to publicly state that waterboarding is criminal torture. As explained in the law review article and elsewhere, the following individuals played primary roles in the authorization of waterboarding and should be immediately identified as the primary subjects of the investigation:

George W. Bush
Richard “Dick” Cheney
John Ashcroft
Alberto Gonzales
Donald Rumsfeld
George J. Tenet
John E. McLaughlin
Porter Goss
David Addington
Jay S. Bybee
John Yoo
Jack Goldsmith
General Ricardo Sanchez
General Geoffrey Miller
General Janis Karpinski

Bush/Cheney Pardon Calendar

Under the circumstances – a public confession of criminal acts by George W. Bush -- you should expect that immediately after the November elections George W. Bush will pardon all of the people listed above, then resign. At that point, Richard “Dick” Cheney would become President, and you should expect that in that capacity Cheney will immediately pardon George W. Bush.

Immediate Appointment of Special Prosecutor

As a result of the expected pardons, a special prosecutor should be appointed immediately

Commencement of Impeachment Proceedings

As a result of the expected pardons, on the day after the November elections, the House of Representatives should impeach George W. Bush and Richard “Dick” Cheney for high crimes -- torture -- violating the following statutes, among others:

18 USC 3231
18 USC Sections 2340-2340A
18 USC 2441

Please note the strategic importance of simply presenting the impeachment to members of the House with no hearings and an immediate vote on the day after the November elections. There is no reason for hearings or delay, since George W. Bush has admitted the criminal act that is the basis of the impeachment.

International Crimes Not Subject to Pardon Power

It is worth pointing out that torture violations of the Law of War and international treaties are not subject to the Presidential pardon power. We will see these individuals on trial in the Hague for their publicly confessed war crimes.

“Above the Law: Unlawful Executive Authorizations Regarding Detainee Treatment, Secret Renditions, Domestic Spying and Claims to Unchecked Executive Power,” Jordan J. Paust, Utah Law Review, 2007, Number 2, Pages 345 to 419

Article available free at: http://www.law.utah.edu/_we...

Re: First Post: About Chris & Heathbar’s Crunch

Chris — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:14:05 -0000

Thanks!

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

Chris — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:41:24 -0000

Hey 'Asshole' - My first impression upon reading your comment was that you're pissed that you didn't think of it first. What's weird about that is that I never though of it that way. I read a story on torrentfreak and followed a few links. Submitted the relevant link to digg, and blogged it so it would appear here.
I did not intend or try to make the top 10 (or front page) of google for that string of letters. It's possible that subliminally I knew that it might happen and chose to blog it after digging it and that drove my decision to blog it not just digg it. That said, I still stand by of my position that I did not intend for 'publicity on google' consciously. If you look at my submissions to digg you will see that I blog most of them.

Also, you may not be aware of this, but by adding the string of letters to my page again in your comment you made it a bit more relevant to google. I did not intend for that to happen. Want me to edit your comment so it doesn't have that string of letters in it?

And by the way, currently my page is #11 if you don't count the indented results and at #13 if you do count them.

Thanks for commenting. Have a nice _____.
~Chris

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

Some Prat — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:26:44 -0000

Lick my butt i'm a fagface

EDIT BY CHRIS: how about no?

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

Honeynova — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:40:16 -0000

honeynova.com

EDIT BY CHRIS: interestingly, this site is not listed in bp's list

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

no — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:23:04 -0000

fucking nice blog layout!

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

Asshole — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:39:29 -0000

congratulations fuckface, your blog got publicity on google. you're on the front page of"what to use instead of OiNK" searches. Im SURE that that's not what you wanted to achieve by posting this blog.
/sarcasm

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

stupid — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:51:12 -0000

Nice post, really informative. Congrats on capitalizing on oink. Your prick must be very large.

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

okokok — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:02:45 -0000

why the f would I digg this?

Re: What to use instead of OiNK

sdfdf — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:17:27 -0000

fUCK YOUR FIREFOX FANBOY PROPAGANDA!!!!
I WONT READ A SINGLE WORD OF THIS SITE!!!

EDIT BY CHRIS: This person probably has some personal issues they're dealing with right now... sdfdf, I wish you the best.

Re: First Post: About Chris & Heathbar’s Crunch

Kylee Weinberg — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:29:19 -0000

Hehe! Good work!

Re: Cleveland Plain Dealer Gets PUNKD

Chris — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:28:38 -0000

not sure what you're thanking me for, but... you're welcome

Re: Cleveland Plain Dealer Gets PUNKD

Alex — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:32:38 -0000

Thank You

Re: Confessions of a Ron Paul Spammer

Chris — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:45:18 -0000

Sorry about any misunderstanding. I am not trying to post words that are not my own and present them as if they were.

I've explained this in my 'about' link at the top of the page.

I've added the blockquote. (Which I usually try to do, but didn't this time... sorry)

I've also added your site's name to the 'read more' link that goes to your blog posting.

I consider the quotation to be an act of fair use.

Once again sorry for any misunderstanding.

Re: Ron Paul to Appear on the Daily Show 6/4

Ron Holland — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:37:44 -0000

Ron Paul Supporters: Where's Giuliani? From www.gambling911.com

http://www.gambling911.com/...

Carrie Stroup with Gambling911 has requested the folks at Sportsbook.com - presently offering political betting odds on the 2008 US Presidential election - to offer odds on Giuliani attending and debating Ron Paul at FreedomFest.

Breaking News at 9:34 AM on 6/4/2007

Dr. Paul accepts the invitation to debate Mr. Giuliani on the Iraq War & US Foreign Policy.
We are still waiting to hear from the Giuliani Campaign.

www.freedomfest.com/debate.htm Paul/Giuliani debate invitation

Re: Confessions of a Ron Paul Spammer

sjburden — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:32:30 -0000

Excuse me, but didn't you steal this off my website...Or is there some technical error which allows you to put your name on my writing?

http://freedomsadvocate.com...

Re: Digg This: 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0

caroll2 — Wed, 02 May 2007 23:55:48 -0000

tee '09 F9' with the whole code on it!
http://moeschwag.com/hcrcot...

Re: 2007 Bilderberg Meeting - Istanbul Turkey

moya — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:47:44 -0000

Yeah, its in Isanbul Turkey. Pervez Musharaf the Pakistani President is going there as well as per the official announcement.

Re: The Atheist’s Wager

Chris — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:58:17 -0000

interesting point. i totally agree.

i would count myself as one of those people

that's why i still say 'oh my god' not 'oh your god' (:-P